According to Anatoly Fomenko’s New Chronology, history as we know it was fabricated by Christian scholars. Discover why he believes it and why he’s not 100 percent crazy.
Valentin Kuzmin / TASS / Getty ImagesAnatoly Fomenko delivers a talking to to scholarly person of Lomonosov Moscow State University . 1972 .
Almost everything you thought you knew about history is awry . The Roman Empire emerged in the late Middle Ages , not the 8th hundred B.C. In fact , Ancient Rome , Greece , and Egypt as we know them did n’t exist at all . And Jesus lived and died in the twelfth C A.D.
Or so say the New Chronology possibility developed by Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko .
Valentin Kuzmin/TASS/Getty ImagesAnatoly Fomenko delivers a lecture to students of Lomonosov Moscow State University. 1972.
Since the seventies , Fomenko ( born in 1945 ) has been build , refinement , and publish his ideas claiming that the history we all know to be true has been largely invent , that centuries upon century ’ worth of story was either faked by shifty scribes or wildly misinterpreted by scholars ( a theory not unlike the infamousPhantom Time Hypothesis ) .
Whilethe finer pointsof the Fomenko possibility are as convoluted and confusing as you might gestate , the guiding principle is that register account before the 11th-14th centuries is generally unreliable for various reasons . about all extant documents from the period before that time , Fomenko writes , are untrustworthy , due to a bit of factor : short timekeeping gadget , discrepant book - keeping , limited availability of outlive document , lack of movable type , and so on .
Moreover , Fomenko argues , pre - Renaissance chronicle was largely fabricated by a number of writer , most of whom did so at the behest of the Catholic Church and other Christian loss leader of the metre so that they could present historical “ grounds ” to back up claims made in the Bible .
Wikimedia CommonsJoseph Scaliger
Wikimedia CommonsJoseph Scaliger
Along these melody , Fomenko specifically focuses on the writings of 16th - C Gallic Christian scholar Joseph Scaliger . According to Fomenko , Scaliger order among the lead historians of the clip who helped mold and propagate the “ false ” record of pre - Rennaisance account that persists to this day .
And if historiographer were n’t being in a flash devious like Scaliger , then they were being devious in a more otiose style , Fomenko claims . That is , Renaissance scholars would simply invent ancient history based on contemporaneous people and events in purchase order to create a“phantom ” story , as he call it .
Wikimedia CommonsIsaac Newton
For example , Fomenko believes that most Eurasiatic chronicle between the third and 11th centuries A.D. was concocted by historians of the 13th-17th C A.D. who created a false disc of those prior centuries by filling that criminal record with pas seul of event that were befall during the 13th-17th one C .
A similar thing happened with the Bible , Fomenko claims . He writes that the Bible we know today is largely work up on 11th-14th - century fabrications and rescript to old texts and that these fabrications and revisions in reality ruminate events that were encounter in the 11th-14th centuries .
So , Fomenko speculate that the Babylonian captivity key out in the Bible ( in which in the Jews of the Kingdom of Judah were invaded by Babylon and held absorbed there for 70 year in the sixth century B.C. ) is actually a false account inspired by the nearly 70 - yr Avignon Papacy period in which seven popes shack in Avignon , France as opposed to Rome due to pressure from the Gallic monarchy .
Why exactly Fomenko argues all of this and how he attempts to prove these claims is another subject entirely .
Apart from his origination of the New Chronology , Fomenko is anotable mathematicianwho has earned his doctor’s degree , teach at Moscow State Lomonosov University , become a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences , won a State Prize of the Russian Federation for mathematics , and published some 250 works .
It ’s this background in mathematics that facilitate explain how Fomenko start build the New Chronology . In 1973 , he begin read other writers ’ work about mutual exclusiveness in historical data point related to lunar Hz . When he begin digging into such data point himself , he close that many lunar eclipses and other celestial effect could not have fall out when historiographer say they did and thus major historic lynchpin could be off by C of years .
His calculations , which have since been criticized by other writer , demonstrate that sure celestial events that were said to have occurred in the time of Jesus had to have in reality go on some 1,000 years by and by .
Wikimedia CommonsIsaac Newton
From there , Fomenko had assistant in building his New Chronology thanks to several centuries ’ worth of other writers ( including Jean Hardouin of seventeenth - century France , Nikolai Morozov of nineteenth - century Russia , and even Isaac Newton ) who ’d long been claiming that Christian scholars in the Middle Ages had misrecorded history either erroneously or deviously .
Fomenko picked up these ideas , added in a emcee of dubitable mathematical computation link to the astronomical record , and so the New Chronology was carry . In the decennium since , Fomenko has published many volumes on the subject , although his only visibility out of doors of Russia is largely trammel to the corner of the net that tip on fringe theories .
In fact , Fomenko ’s estimation have n’t even received enough attention to warrant much rebuttal from the scientific community . Perhaps it ’s not worth rebut a possibility that so plainly fly in the face of mountains of archeologic grounds , written records , carbon - dated artifacts , and on and on .
Nevertheless , as mistaken as Fomenko ’s claims are , there ’s a centre of verity at the heart . History — and this becomes truer and truer the further back you go — is always a reconstruction to some extent .
As Fomenkowrote , “ When we say that Brutus killed Caesar with a sword , the only thing it intend is that some written source that managed to contact our time says so , and nothing but ! The consequence of just how faithfully document story reflects existent effect is very complex and involve a exceptional study . ”
He ’s correct , it ’s just belike not his kind of special study that we needed .
After this face at Anatoly Fomenko and the New Chronology , interpret up on other flakey fringe theories include thePaul is deadrumor popular among some Beatles fans as well as the belief that themoon landing was fudge .
